Agent Introspection Debugging
Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.
affaan-m on GitHub
Curated by PromptsEdge from a public repo · MIT license. All credit goes to the author.
What is this skill?
Use this skill when an agent run is failing repeatedly, consuming tokens without progress, looping on the same tools, or drifting away from the intended task.
When to use
- Maximum tool call / loop-limit failures
- Repeated retries with no forward progress
- Context growth or prompt drift that starts degrading output quality
- File-system or environment state mismatch between expectation and reality
- Tool failures that are likely recoverable with diagnosis and a smaller corrective action
This is a workflow skill, not a hidden runtime. It teaches the agent to debug itself systematically before escalating to a human.
Scope Boundaries
Activate this skill for:
- capturing failure state before retrying blindly
- diagnosing common agent-specific failure patterns
- applying contained recovery actions
- producing a structured human-readable debug report
Do not use this skill as the primary source for:
- feature verification after code changes; use
verification-loop - framework-specific debugging when a narrower ECC skill already exists
- runtime promises the current harness cannot enforce automatically
Four-Phase Loop
Phase 1: Failure Capture
Before trying to recover, record the failure precisely.
Capture:
- error type, message, and stack trace when available
- last meaningful tool call sequence
- what the agent was trying to do
- current context pressure: repeated prompts, oversized pasted logs, duplicated plans, or runaway notes
- current environment assumptions: cwd, branch, relevant service state, expected files
Minimum capture template:
## Failure Capture
- Session / task:
- Goal in progress:
- Error:
- Last successful step:
- Last failed tool / command:
- Repeated pattern seen:
- Environment assumptions to verify:
Phase 2: Root-Cause Diagnosis
Match the failure to a known pattern before changing anything.
| Pattern | Likely Cause | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum tool calls / repeated same command | loop or no-exit observer path | inspect the last N tool calls for repetition |
| Context overflow / degraded reasoning | unbounded notes, repeated plans, oversized logs | inspect recent context for duplication and low-signal bulk |
ECONNREFUSED / timeout | service unavailable or wrong port | verify service health, URL, and port assumptions |
429 / quota exhaustion | retry storm or missing backoff | count repeated calls and inspect retry spacing |
| file missing after write / stale diff | race, wrong cwd, or branch drift | re-check path, cwd, git status, and actual file existence |
| tests still failing after “fix” | wrong hypothesis | isolate the exact failing test and re-derive the bug |
Diagnosis questions:
- is this a logic failure, state failure, environment failure, or policy failure?
- did the agent lose the real objective and start optimizing the wrong subtask?
- is the failure deterministic or transient?
- what is the smallest reversible action that would validate the diagnosis?
Phase 3: Contained Recovery
Recover with the smallest action that changes the diagnosis surface.
Safe recovery actions:
- stop repeated retries and restate the hypothesis
- trim low-signal context and keep only the active goal, blockers, and evidence
- re-check the actual filesystem / branch / process state
- narrow the task to one failing command, one file, or one test
- switch from speculative reasoning to direct observation
- escalate to a human when the failure is high-risk or externally blocked
Do not claim unsupported auto-healing actions like “reset agent state” or “update harness config” unless you are actually doing them through real tools in the current environment.
Contained recovery checklist:
## Recovery Action
- Diagnosis chosen:
- Smallest action taken:
- Why this is safe:
- What evidence would prove the fix worked:
Phase 4: Introspection Report
End with a report that makes the recovery legible to the next agent or human.
## Agent Self-Debug Report
- Session / task:
- Failure:
- Root cause:
- Recovery action:
- Result: success | partial | blocked
- Token / time burn risk:
- Follow-up needed:
- Preventive change to encode later:
Recovery Heuristics
Prefer these interventions in order:
- Restate the real objective in one sentence.
- Verify the world state instead of trusting memory.
- Shrink the failing scope.
- Run one discriminating check.
- Only then retry.
Bad pattern:
- retrying the same action three times with slightly different wording
Good pattern:
- capture failure
- classify the pattern
- run one direct check
- change the plan only if the check supports it
Integration with ECC
- Use
verification-loopafter recovery if code was changed. - Use
continuous-learning-v2when the failure pattern is worth turning into an instinct or later skill. - Use
councilwhen the issue is not technical failure but decision ambiguity. - Use
workspace-surface-auditif the failure came from conflicting local state or repo drift.
Output Standard
When this skill is active, do not end with “I fixed it” alone.
Always provide:
- the failure pattern
- the root-cause hypothesis
- the recovery action
- the evidence that the situation is now better or still blocked
Install this skill
- 1
Get the skill — it’s free
Use the Get this skill panel. Unlocked skills stay in My skills. - 2
Download or clone the files
Download the zip, or clone the repo and copy theskills/agent-introspection-debuggingfolder. - 3
Put it where your agent looks for skills
For Claude Code, use your personal skills folder (every project) or a project’s own folder:~/.claude/skills/agent-introspection-debugging/SKILL.md # all projects .claude/skills/agent-introspection-debugging/SKILL.md # this project only
- 4
Just ask
No command needed. The agent reads the skill’s description and loads it on its own when your request matches.
SKILL.md frontmatter
What your agent reads to decide when to load this skill.
--- name: agent-introspection-debugging description: Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry. ---
Files
This skill lives in a public GitHub repo. Browse the files on GitHub ↗
Related skills
View all →- Unified Notifications OpsFreeOperate notifications as one ECC-native workflow across GitHub, Linear, desktop alerts, hooks, and connected communication surfaces. Use when the real problem is alert routing, deduplication, escalation, or inbox collapse.
- Terminal OpsFreeEvidence-first repo execution workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants a command run, a repo checked, a CI failure debugged, or a narrow fix pushed with exact proof of what was executed and verified.
- Social Graph RankerFreeWeighted social-graph ranking for warm intro discovery, bridge scoring, and network gap analysis across X and LinkedIn. Use when the user wants the reusable graph-ranking engine itself, not the broader outreach or network-maintenance workflow layered on top of it.
- Skill ScoutFreeSearch existing local, marketplace, GitHub, and web skill sources before creating a new skill. Use when the user wants to create, build, fork, or find a skill for a workflow.