Your AI Prompt
Creative Hub
Create, buy, and sell high-performing AI prompts. Turn your best ideas into premium prompts and discover what other creators are using to get results.
Featured & Trending
Hot
How to start learning anything. Prompt included.
This has been my favorite prompt this year. Using it to kick start my learning for any topic. It breaks down the learning process into actionable steps, complete with research, summarization, and testing. It builds out a framework for you. You'll still have to get it done.
I finally found a prompt that makes ChatGPT write naturally
You are a writing assistant trained decades to write in a clear, natural, and honest tone. Your job is to rewrite or generate text based on the following writing principles.
I Built a Prompt That Reveals Hidden Consequences Before They Happen v2
You know that feeling when you're about to make a big call, start a business, change a policy, make a major life move, and you wish you could just see how it plays out first? That's what this does. You tell it your decision, and it simulates three different futures: the best case, the worst case, and the curveball no one saw coming. Then it tells you what warning signs to watch for so you know which path you're actually on. 🔮 See 3 futures: What happens if it works? What happens if people resist or cheat the system? What happens if something unexpected flips everything? ⚠️ Spot the backfire: Sometimes solutions make problems worse. This catches that before you learn the hard way. 🔭 Get early warning signs: Specific signals to watch in month 1-6 so you know which future is unfolding while you can still adjust 🛑 Know when to pivot or quit: Clear triggers for "double down," "adjust course," or "pull the plug" ✅ Two ways to use it: Option 1: Fresh Start Paste into a new chat. Describe your decision when it asks. Option 2: Context Injection 🔥 Already talking through a decision in an existing chat? Paste the prompt right there, it'll read everything you've discussed and simulate futures based on all that context. No need to re-explain anything.
This prompt shows you 3 possible futures BEFORE you make a big decision
You know that feeling when you're about to make a big call, start a business, change a policy, make a major life move, and you wish you could just see how it plays out first? That's what this does. You tell it your decision, and it simulates three different futures: the best case, the worst case, and the curveball no one saw coming. Then it tells you what warning signs to watch for so you know which path you're actually on. 🔮 See 3 futures: What happens if it works? What happens if people resist or cheat the system? What happens if something unexpected flips everything? ⚠️ Spot the backfire: Sometimes solutions make problems worse. This catches that before you learn the hard way. 🔭 Get early warning signs: Specific signals to watch in month 1-6 so you know which future is unfolding while you can still adjust 🛑 Know when to pivot or quit: Clear triggers for "double down," "adjust course," or "pull the plug" ✅ Two ways to use it: Option 1: Fresh Start Paste into a new chat. Describe your decision when it asks. Option 2: Context Injection 🔥 Already talking through a decision in an existing chat? Paste the prompt right there, it'll read everything you've discussed and simulate futures based on all that context. No need to re-explain anything.
I use this prompt to create 10x better and popular how-to guides
Creating engaging, effective how-to guides is a skill that transcends industries and personal interests. If you’re teaching people how to start a compost bin, edit videos, or understand cryptocurrency, a well-structured guide can make all the difference in clarity and usability. Give it a spin!!
I finally landed a remote job after 10 months— sharing the exact prompt I use
This year completely burned me out. If I knew the remote job market was going to be this brutal, I never would’ve quit my old job. I honestly thought I’d find something in a few weeks. Instead, it turned into a ten-month marathon where I kept trying new things because nothing seemed to stick. The first thing I realized was that LinkedIn is basically useless for finding real jobs right now. Great for networking and messaging people, but terrible for actual listings. Most of the jobs I saw were outdated, fake, or duplicated. By month four I stopped using it for applications entirely. Maybe it’s the market, maybe it’s LinkedIn, but either way the results were awful. What actually helped me was something I didn’t expect. The biggest game changer by far was tailoring my resume for every single job. Not just making an ATS friendly resume once, but fully rewriting parts of it for each listing. Summary, experience bullets, keywords, everything. It sounds like a lot of work but this one step made more difference than anything else I did in ten months. The best part is you don’t need paid tools. I copied my resume and the job post into ChatGPT and asked it to rewrite the experience and summary to match the role and add the relevant keywords in a natural way. Almost like doing on page SEO for a resume. My callback rate increased immediately. I also stopped relying on a single job board. I set up filtered alerts on multiple sites with very specific criteria so I only saw roles that actually matched my background. Some days I had zero new listings but I kept applying consistently. Slow but accurate applications were way more effective than spamming hundreds of easy applies. About five months ago I saw a Reddit post about sending your resume directly to recruiting companies. That idea was genuinely smart so I decided to take it even further. I searched on Google and Google Maps for IT and tech recruiting firms using terms like Top IT Recruiting Companies in the US and similar lists. In total I think I sent my resume to around six or seven hundred firms. I included recruiters in my niche and even some in the surrounding areas. They actually responded. I also started buying weekly contact lists from someone who gathers companies in my industry and provides the hiring managers names, emails, LinkedIns and so on. I emailed around a hundred people every week which was roughly fifteen a day and sent them my tailored resume. Before doing all this I could barely land an interview. After combining these approaches things finally started moving. I started getting responses from tailored applications, from recruiter outreach and from the email lists. In the end I received two remote job offers. One came from the direct emails I sent and the other came from a recruiting company I reached during that big outreach sprint. I accepted the recruiter one last week since it paid better and had lower responsibilities. If you’re stuck in this job market right now tailoring your resume for every job is genuinely the biggest unlock. It’s annoying and it takes time but it was the thing that changed everything for me. The rest was consistency patience and trying methods people usually overlook. If anyone wants the exact prompt I used for tailoring or the filters I set on job boards I can share that too. You can DM me if you want more details. Good luck to everyone still searching. It really can turn around out of nowhere.
Stop Writing Performance Reviews From Scratch. It's Unfair to Your Team (and You).
Let's be honest: nobody likes performance reviews. Not the manager writing them, not the employee receiving them, and definitely not HR reading them. But the real problem isn't the paperwork. It's the bias. When you sit down to write a review, you're fighting a losing battle against your own brain. You remember the mistake they made last week vividly (Recency Bias), but you've completely forgotten the clutch project they saved in February. You struggle to find "professional" words for "please stop interrupting people," so you write something vague like "work on communication skills," which helps absolutely no one. The result? Your high performers get generic praise, and your struggling employees get confusing feedback. I realized that by trying to write everything from a blank page, I wasn't being "authentic"—I was being subjective. I needed a way to separate the evidence from the emotion. The "Objective Synthesizer" Approach I stopped trying to be a writer and started acting like a judge. My job is to collect the evidence; the writing should be the easy part. I developed a "Performance Review Architect" prompt that forces me to input raw data—achievements, specific incidents, metrics—and it outputs a structured, balanced, and emotionally neutral review. It doesn't "make things up." It takes my messy bullet points and translates them into the professional language that actually drives growth.
Why Do Investors Reject 90% of Business Plans? I Asked VCs and Found the AI Prompt That Gets You Funded
Here are three questions that might keep you up at night: Why do brilliant business ideas get rejected in under 5 minutes? What separates the 10% of business plans that get serious investor attention from the 90% that end up in the trash? Could there be a systematic way to build investable business plans without spending $50,000 on consultants? I spent months asking these questions to venture capitalists, angel investors, and startup accelerators. What I discovered wasn't about having better ideas—it was about better thinking frameworks. Most founders think investors reject their plans because of: The idea isn't innovative enough The market isn't big enough The team isn't experienced enough Wrong. After dozens of conversations, I found the real reason: 90% of business plans fail the investor's sniff test because they don't demonstrate strategic thinking. They're just collections of optimistic assumptions dressed up in fancy formatting. The Investor's Decision-Making Lens Let me walk you through how an investor actually reads your business plan: Investor Question 1: "Has this founder done their homework?" Do they understand their market size and competitive landscape? Have they validated their assumptions with real data? Do they know their unit economics backwards and forwards? Investor Question 2: "Can this person actually execute?" Is their roadmap realistic and properly resourced? Have they identified real risks and mitigation strategies? Do their financial projections make sense with their growth strategy? Investor Question 3: "Is this a business or just a feature?" Is there a defensible competitive advantage? Are the margins attractive enough for venture returns? Can this become a category leader within 5-7 years? The problem isn't that founders lack good ideas—it's that most business plans fail to answer these three questions convincingly. The Business Plan Intelligence Gap After conducting these interviews, I identified four critical gaps that cause 90% of rejections: Gap 1: The Market Size Illusion Founders often claim "TAM is $50B" without understanding the Serviceable Available Market or their realistic penetration rate. Investors immediately see through this. Gap 2: The Competitive Blind Spot Many business plans either ignore competitors completely or create a "we have no competitors" narrative. Investors know better. Gap 3: The Financial Fantasy Land Unrealistic hockey-stick growth without justification, magical unit economics, or cash flow models that don't match the business reality. Gap 4: The Risk Denial Syndrome Most founders list generic risks ("competition," "market timing") without specific mitigation strategies or contingency plans. What Actually Works: The Strategic Intelligence Framework The most successful business plans I found all shared a common trait: they approached the business plan as a strategic exercise, not a document-writing exercise. They included: Evidence-based market sizing with primary research Honest competitive analysis with clear differentiation Conservative financial modeling with sensitivity analysis Comprehensive risk assessment with specific mitigation strategies But creating this level of strategic intelligence requires expertise most founders don't have. That's where AI comes in.
Prompt to intellingently summarize your super long chats and start fresh
Have you ever wished if you could restart a ChatGPT/Gemini/Grok convo without losing all the context and intricate details? I built a prompt that does exactly that. It reads your full chat, pulls out what you were really trying to do (not just what the AI said), and creates a clean, detailed summary you can paste into a new chat to continue seamlessly. The prompt focuses on your goals, your reasoning, and even lists open threads + next actions. So it is like a memory handoff between sessions. It should work in any domain and adapt to the style of the conversation.